Warum ein Rückgang der Bankreserven um 88 Milliarden US-Dollar kein Beweis für einen Liquiditätsengpass bei Bitcoin ist – noch nicht | CryptoAce VIP
Global Network:
WHALE RADAR
BTC $89,420 +3.8% ETH $3,480 +2.4% SOL $192 +6.1% BNB $640 +1.9% XRP $1.42 +4.5% BTC $89,420 +3.8% ETH $3,480 +2.4% SOL $192 +6.1%
← Back to All Stories

Warum ein Rückgang der Bankreserven um 88 Milliarden US-Dollar kein Beweis für einen Liquiditätsengpass bei Bitcoin ist – noch nicht

Category: Bitcoin Run Alpha Source published: Collected: Source: CryptoSlate
How does this story make you feel?
Warum ein Rückgang der Bankreserven um 88 Milliarden US-Dollar kein Beweis für einen Liquiditätsengpass bei Bitcoin ist – noch nicht

Story summary

Am Mittwoch sanken die Reserven um 88,236 Milliarden US-Dollar, während ihr Wochendurchschnitt um 17,897 Milliarden US-Dollar stieg, was die Grenzen der auf Reserven basierenden Bitcoin-Liquiditätssignale deutlich machte. Der Beitrag „Warum ein Rückgang der Bankreserven um 88 Milliarden US-Dollar kein Beweis für einen Liquiditätsengpass bei Bitcoin ist“ erschien zuerst auf CryptoSlate.

📌 Key Highlights & Takeaways

  • Am Mittwoch sanken die Reserven um 88,236 Milliarden US-Dollar, während ihr Wochendurchschnitt um 17,897 Milliarden US-Dollar stieg, was die Grenzen der auf Reserven basierenden Bitcoin-Liquiditätssignale deutlich machte.
  • Der Beitrag „Warum ein Rückgang der Bankreserven um 88 Milliarden US-Dollar kein Beweis für einen Liquiditätsengpass bei Bitcoin ist“ erschien zuerst auf CryptoSlate.

Bitcoin’s quarter-end liquidity signal changes direction depending on which reserve measure is used. Federal Reserve data released Oct. 1 show bank reserves falling $88.236 billion between Sept. 23 and Sept. 30 Wednesday snapshots, while their weekly average rose $17.897 billion.

Reserves are balances banks hold at the Federal Reserve to make and receive payments. Their level matters for dollar financing, but a reserve chart alone cannot establish whether pressure reached Bitcoin. The balance-sheet decline is largely accounted for by Treasury cash and reverse repos, predominantly involving foreign official accounts. September 30’s median cost of Treasury-backed overnight borrowing was 3.90%, within the range of the five latest observed readings.

September’s quarter-end therefore offers a test of the measurements behind a liquidity thesis. An endpoint balance, an average balance and a funding price describe different aspects of the system. Treating them as interchangeable can turn the same week into opposing market signals.

The Wednesday reserve series fell from $2.969922 trillion on Sept. 23 to $2.881686 trillion on Sept. 30. The weekly-average series rose from $2.930193 trillion to $2.948090 trillion for the weeks ending on those dates.

Both readings come from the Fed’s H.4.1 release. One compares balances on two Wednesdays; the other compares averages of daily figures across two weeks. A lower final observation can coexist with a higher average, because the readings cover different time windows.

The Treasury General Account, the government’s account at the Fed, illustrates the same problem. Its Wednesday balance rose $36.729 billion to $984.046 billion. Its weekly average fell $28.410 billion to $948.674 billion.

Mixing the Wednesday reserve decline with the average Treasury decline would combine observations from different windows. It could obscure the very cash movement an investor is trying to explain. A chart labeled “weekly” still needs a second question: is each point a weekly average or a balance observed once a week?

The endpoint captures the quarter-end position. The average describes the level across the week. Neither provides a complete daily path or proves how persistent the final-day position will be. For a Bitcoin liquidity argument, choosing the window changes the evidence before any price forecast enters the discussion.

💎

Crypto Profit & Yield Calculator

Simulate trading returns, staking APY, and crypto gains with real-time fee modeling.

Launch Free Tool ➔

Source: CryptoSlate.

Read the full story at the original source ↗

For questions: mrsmithcons@gmail.com.

← PREVIOUS STORY Über 80.000.000 US-Dollar an JPMorgan Chase und Wells Fargo, die dem Zahlungsunternehmen Montana gehören, wurden wegen potenziellen Betrugs plötzlich beschlagnahmt #Whale Tracking NEXT STORY → Einer Umfrage zufolge riskieren Banken, 230.000.000.000 US-Dollar an Zahlungseinnahmen zu verlieren, da Stablecoins und tokenisierte Einlagen zunehmen #Whale Tracking
What is your reaction to this report?

💎 On-Chain Wallet Tracking & Breakout Targets

Direct wallet address monitoring, smart money flows, and liquidity depth.

⚡ Track Whale Wallets Now ➔
🌐 NETWORK SYNDICATION

Trending Stories Across Our Media Network

Direct access to breaking updates, market intelligence & viral coverage from our sister publications.

⚡ UP NEXT IN BITCOIN RUN ALPHA Continuous Auto-Feed
Einer Umfrage zufolge riskieren Banken, 230.000.000.000 US-Dollar an Zahlungseinnahmen zu verlieren, da Stablecoins und tokenisierte Einlagen zunehmen
Whale Tracking

Einer Umfrage zufolge riskieren Banken, 230.000.000.000 US-Dollar an Zahlungseinnahmen zu verlieren, da Stablecoins und tokenisierte Einlagen zunehmen

Laut einer Umfrage des IT-Dienstleistungs- und Beratungsunternehmens Capgemini riskieren Banken einen Verlust von 230 Milliarden US-Dollar an Zahlungseinnahmen,...

Continue to Next Story ➔
🌐 GLOBAL DIGITAL MEDIA & INTELLIGENCE NETWORK

Specialist Publications & Editorial Desks

Direct access to verified on-chain analytics, sharp sports models, high-roller gaming suites, and breakthrough technology reporting.

WHALE RADAR: High-Conviction On-Chain Accumulation & Yield
Get Whale Signals ➔
✓ Reel link copied to clipboard!

</> Embed on Your Website

Copy and paste this snippet into any article, forum, or website:

Share with Friends

💬 WhatsApp ✈️ Telegram 𝕏 Share