Eclair fusiona soluciones para fallas de Lightning que podrían quemar Bitcoin en tarifas
Story summary
Las reparaciones de financiación y empalmes de octubre limitan las tarifas de los pares y verifican las transacciones de backend, mientras que la última versión listada sigue siendo la v0.14.3 de septiembre. La publicación Eclair fusiona correcciones para fallas Lightning que podrían quemar Bitcoin en tarifas apareció por primera vez en CryptoSlate.
📌 Key Highlights & Takeaways
- Las reparaciones de financiación y empalmes de octubre limitan las tarifas de los pares y verifican las transacciones de backend, mientras que la última versión listada sigue siendo la v0.14.3 de septiembre.
- La publicación Eclair fusiona correcciones para fallas Lightning que podrían quemar Bitcoin en tarifas apareció por primera vez en CryptoSlate.
Eclair, ACINQ's Lightning node software, has merged two repairs for gaps that could make a node lose Bitcoin through excessive mining fees during channel funding and splicing. One limits a peer's fee-bump demands when Eclair contributes funds; the other checks transactions from a compromised Bitcoin backend while Eclair retains the signing keys.
The repairs merged into the project's master branch on Oct. 2 and Oct. 5. As of Oct. 12, its release page still listed September's v0.14.3 as latest. The two October fixes postdate that packaged release.
Bitcoin Optech's Oct. 9 newsletter highlighted both changes as closing protection gaps during dual funding and splicing.
The first repair, PR #3388 , concerns peer-initiated replace-by-fee, or RBF, attempts during a dual-funded channel opening or a splice that adjusts a channel's funding. A peer could request a replacement transaction with a higher fee rate. Eclair kept its wallet contribution and paid for its inputs at that rate, without an upper bound or fee budget on this path.
That let a malicious peer impose an arbitrary mining fee rate on the contributing node while contributing nothing itself. The loss would be paid as fees to miners rather than transferred directly to the peer.
The repair rejects attempts above the maximum funding fee rate Eclair recommends to its peer. Two exceptions remain: the peer buys liquidity and pays the fees for Eclair's inputs, or the Eclair node contributes no funds to the transaction. In those cases, Eclair does not bear the cost addressed by this limit.
PR #3390 addresses a separate threat in Eclair-signer mode. Bitcoin Core's backend, bitcoind, selects coins and builds transactions, while Eclair retains the keys and signs.
A compromised backend could report a fee within budget while constructing a transaction that actually paid more, including by dropping the change output. Under Bitcoin's transaction accounting , input value not assigned to outputs becomes a miner fee. Missing change can therefore spend funds without paying an attacker's address.
Crypto Profit & Yield Calculator
Simulate trading returns, staking APY, and crypto gains with real-time fee modeling.
Source: CryptoSlate.
Read the full story at the original source ↗
For questions: mrsmithcons@gmail.com.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions (Bitcoin Run Alpha Briefing)
What on-chain catalyst or market signal triggered this Bitcoin Run Alpha movement?
Institutional on-chain telemetry, cold storage accumulation, and derivative funding rates indicate spot liquidity positioning that underpins this Bitcoin Run Alpha development.
How should investors interpret current liquidity pools and network hash activity?
Derivative funding remains balanced and exchange reserves continue trending downward, mitigating systemic liquidation cascades and strengthening the underlying structural floor.
Where are the critical technical support and invalidation levels?
Anchored volume-weighted average price (VWAP) benchmarks and high-density order book clusters near prior consolidation ranges serve as key risk management thresholds.
💎 On-Chain Wallet Tracking & Breakout Targets
Direct wallet address monitoring, smart money flows, and liquidity depth.
⚡ Track Whale Wallets Now ➔