Los nodos Eclair Bitcoin Lightning sin parches podrían volver a fallar cada vez que se reinician | CryptoAce VIP
Global Network:
WHALE RADAR
BTC $89,420 +3.8% ETH $3,480 +2.4% SOL $192 +6.1% BNB $640 +1.9% XRP $1.42 +4.5% BTC $89,420 +3.8% ETH $3,480 +2.4% SOL $192 +6.1%
← Back to All Stories

Los nodos Eclair Bitcoin Lightning sin parches podrían volver a fallar cada vez que se reinician

Category: Bitcoin Run Alpha Source published: Collected: Source: CryptoSlate
How does this story make you feel?
Los nodos Eclair Bitcoin Lightning sin parches podrían volver a fallar cada vez que se reinician

Story summary

Nuevas revelaciones muestran cómo los canales no financiados guardados podrían abrumar a los nodos más antiguos nuevamente al reiniciarse, a pesar de que se envió una solución en julio. La publicación Los nodos Eclair Bitcoin Lightning sin parches podrían volver a fallar cada vez que se reinician apareció por primera vez en CryptoSlate.

📌 Key Highlights & Takeaways

  • Nuevas revelaciones muestran cómo los canales no financiados guardados podrían abrumar a los nodos más antiguos nuevamente al reiniciarse, a pesar de que se envió una solución en julio.
  • La publicación Los nodos Eclair Bitcoin Lightning sin parches podrían volver a fallar cada vez que se reinician apareció por primera vez en CryptoSlate.

A newly disclosed unfunded-channel flaw could leave Eclair, a Bitcoin Lightning implementation, crashing repeatedly without an attacker spending BTC on-chain. The flaw affected reachable nodes running v0.14.0 and earlier, with saved channel records making a restart insufficient to restore service.

Researcher Erick Cestari published the persistent-crash finding Sept. 30 and explained it alongside a separate denial-of-service bug in an Oct. 1 developer post . Both were fixed in v0.14.1, released in July, before the public disclosures. ACINQ now recommends the later v0.14.3 security release for separate vulnerabilities.

Eclair limited the number of pending channels a peer could open, but inconsistent checks of temporary and final channel identifiers let its counter undercount unfunded channels. A malicious peer could accumulate saved requests without broadcasting the funding transaction or paying an on-chain fee.

That distinction matters: the BTC normally needed to fund a channel did not have to be committed for the vulnerable node to incur memory and database costs. The attack still required computing resources and network traffic.

In Cestari’s proof of concept, Eclair v0.14.0 ran in regtest, Bitcoin’s local testing environment. He reported that the node exhausted a 4 GB Java virtual machine heap after about 47 minutes 43 seconds, with 217,623 rows accumulated in the channel database. That is one laboratory benchmark, not a universal attack duration.

The initial crash left those records on disk. During startup, Eclair reloaded the channels and exhausted memory again. Cestari described increasing the heap or manually removing fake channel records as recovery measures. Repeated restarts left the underlying load in place.

The demonstration concerns one vulnerable node’s availability. It does not establish live exploitation or the number of unpatched nodes.

ACINQ merged PR #3324 July 17. The patch strengthened duplicate-channel checks, and v0.14.1 shipped July 29 . According to Erick Cestari / Delving Bitcoin, v0.14.0 and earlier are affected, while v0.14.1 or later addresses these two denial-of-service findings.

💎

Crypto Profit & Yield Calculator

Simulate trading returns, staking APY, and crypto gains with real-time fee modeling.

Launch Free Tool ➔

Source: CryptoSlate.

Read the full story at the original source ↗

For questions: mrsmithcons@gmail.com.

← PREVIOUS STORY Más de $80,000,000 en JPMorgan Chase y Wells Fargo pertenecientes a la firma de pagos de Montana fueron incautados abruptamente por posible fraude #Whale Tracking NEXT STORY → Los bancos corren el riesgo de perder 230.000.000.000 de dólares en ingresos por pagos a medida que aumentan las monedas estables y los depósitos tokenizados, según una encuesta #Whale Tracking
What is your reaction to this report?

💎 On-Chain Wallet Tracking & Breakout Targets

Direct wallet address monitoring, smart money flows, and liquidity depth.

⚡ Track Whale Wallets Now ➔
🌐 NETWORK SYNDICATION

Trending Stories Across Our Media Network

Direct access to breaking updates, market intelligence & viral coverage from our sister publications.

⚡ UP NEXT IN BITCOIN RUN ALPHA Continuous Auto-Feed
Los bancos corren el riesgo de perder 230.000.000.000 de dólares en ingresos por pagos a medida que aumentan las monedas estables y los depósitos tokenizados, según una encuesta
Whale Tracking

Los bancos corren el riesgo de perder 230.000.000.000 de dólares en ingresos por pagos a medida que aumentan las monedas estables y los depósitos tokenizados, según una encuesta

Los bancos corren el riesgo de perder 230 mil millones de dólares en ingresos por pagos a medida que las monedas estables, los depósitos tokenizados y las moned...

Continue to Next Story ➔
🌐 GLOBAL DIGITAL MEDIA & INTELLIGENCE NETWORK

Specialist Publications & Editorial Desks

Direct access to verified on-chain analytics, sharp sports models, high-roller gaming suites, and breakthrough technology reporting.

WHALE RADAR: High-Conviction On-Chain Accumulation & Yield
Get Whale Signals ➔
✓ Reel link copied to clipboard!

</> Embed on Your Website

Copy and paste this snippet into any article, forum, or website:

Share with Friends

💬 WhatsApp ✈️ Telegram 𝕏 Share